<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Media Standards Trust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediastandardstrust.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediastandardstrust.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:01:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Missed opportunities: how Lords see the future of investigative journalism by Missed opportunities: how Lords see the future of investigative journalism &#8211; Martin Moore &#171; Inforrm&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://mediastandardstrust.org/blog/missed-opportunities-how-lords-see-the-future-of-investigative-journalism/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Missed opportunities: how Lords see the future of investigative journalism &#8211; Martin Moore &#171; Inforrm&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediastandardstrust.org/?p=2279#comment-586</guid>
		<description>[...] post originally appeared on the Media Standards Trust blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post originally appeared on the Media Standards Trust blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Local news and the democratic deficit &#8211; Port Talbot by Missed opportunities: how Lords see the future of investigative journalism &#8211; Martin Moore &#171; Inforrm&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://mediastandardstrust.org/blog/local-news-and-the-democratic-deficit-port-talbot/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>Missed opportunities: how Lords see the future of investigative journalism &#8211; Martin Moore &#171; Inforrm&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediastandardstrust.org/?p=1582#comment-585</guid>
		<description>[...] scrutiny of other public authorities. This is certainly the case in south Wales, where we run a joint project on the future of local news with Cardiff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scrutiny of other public authorities. This is certainly the case in south Wales, where we run a joint project on the future of local news with Cardiff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media Standards Trust response to Johann Hari allegations by Using examples from the publishing industry in general and journalistic practise in particular, discuss the consequences of plagiarism. &#171; cathyeglington</title>
		<link>http://mediastandardstrust.org/mst-news/media-standards-trust-response-to-johann-hari-allegations/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Using examples from the publishing industry in general and journalistic practise in particular, discuss the consequences of plagiarism. &#171; cathyeglington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediastandardstrust.org/?p=1976#comment-584</guid>
		<description>[...] MST, http://mediastandardstrust.org/mst-news/media-standards-trust-response-to-johann-hari-allegations/, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MST, <a href="http://mediastandardstrust.org/mst-news/media-standards-trust-response-to-johann-hari-allegations/" rel="nofollow">http://mediastandardstrust.org/mst-news/media-standards-trust-response-to-johann-hari-allegations/</a>, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The future of investigative journalism: Submission to House of Lords Communications Select Committee by Journalisted Weekly: Redknapp and Capello, Syria and Homs, and Leveson &#124; Staffroom Secrets</title>
		<link>http://mediastandardstrust.org/publications/the-future-of-investigative-journalism-submission-to-house-of-lords-communications-select-committee/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalisted Weekly: Redknapp and Capello, Syria and Homs, and Leveson &#124; Staffroom Secrets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediastandardstrust.org/?p=2176#comment-583</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the MST&#8217;s submission to parliament&#8217;s Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions and the House of Lords Communications Select Committee on investigative journalism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the MST&#8217;s submission to parliament&#8217;s Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions and the House of Lords Communications Select Committee on investigative journalism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The future of investigative journalism: Submission to House of Lords Communications Select Committee by Journalisted Weekly: Redknapp and Capello, Syria and Homs, and Leveson &#124; Editors&#039; Blog &#124; Journalism.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://mediastandardstrust.org/publications/the-future-of-investigative-journalism-submission-to-house-of-lords-communications-select-committee/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalisted Weekly: Redknapp and Capello, Syria and Homs, and Leveson &#124; Editors&#039; Blog &#124; Journalism.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediastandardstrust.org/?p=2176#comment-582</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the MST&#8217;s submission to parliament&#8217;s Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions and the House of Lords Communications Select Committee on investigative journalism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the MST&#8217;s submission to parliament&#8217;s Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions and the House of Lords Communications Select Committee on investigative journalism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shrinking World: The decline of international reporting in the British press by A Deep Dive into the Boston Globe Online and the Future of Print &#124; Local Media Report</title>
		<link>http://mediastandardstrust.org/publications/shrinking-world-the-decline-of-international-reporting-in-the-british-press/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>A Deep Dive into the Boston Globe Online and the Future of Print &#124; Local Media Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediastandardstrust.org/?p=1298#comment-581</guid>
		<description>[...] newspapers is to focus on local content at the expense of global coverage (see, for example, this Media Standards Trust paper, which found that international reporting had decreased in every measurable way, while overall [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] newspapers is to focus on local content at the expense of global coverage (see, for example, this Media Standards Trust paper, which found that international reporting had decreased in every measurable way, while overall [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MST/Hacked Off statement on Paul Dacre&#8217;s Leveson Inquiry appearance by Paul The Inept</title>
		<link>http://mediastandardstrust.org/mst-news/msthacked-off-statement-on-paul-dacres-leveson-inquiry-appearance/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul The Inept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediastandardstrust.org/?p=2243#comment-579</guid>
		<description>Is it just me, or is the obsession with using Hugh Grant as an example of someone whoes privacy the press feels it can invade, is based based on a personal dislike of him, his films and the fact that he decided take to fight back against the bullying press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or is the obsession with using Hugh Grant as an example of someone whoes privacy the press feels it can invade, is based based on a personal dislike of him, his films and the fact that he decided take to fight back against the bullying press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MST/Hacked Off statement on Paul Dacre&#8217;s Leveson Inquiry appearance by Paul Haworth</title>
		<link>http://mediastandardstrust.org/mst-news/msthacked-off-statement-on-paul-dacres-leveson-inquiry-appearance/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Haworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediastandardstrust.org/?p=2243#comment-578</guid>
		<description>You could always accuse Paul Dacre and Associated Press of a mendatious smeer against the Hacked Off campaign and MST?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could always accuse Paul Dacre and Associated Press of a mendatious smeer against the Hacked Off campaign and MST?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MST/Hacked Off statement on Paul Dacre&#8217;s Leveson Inquiry appearance by Paul Haworth</title>
		<link>http://mediastandardstrust.org/mst-news/msthacked-off-statement-on-paul-dacres-leveson-inquiry-appearance/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Haworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediastandardstrust.org/?p=2243#comment-577</guid>
		<description>I watched Paul Dacre&#039;s evidence to the Leveson Inquiry and was amazed how blind he was to his own hypocracy.  He attacked an &#039;individual&#039; (Hugh Grant) for accusing an &#039;organisation&#039; (Associated Newspapers) of phone hacking.  That oppitomises the &#039;bullying&#039; attitude of the &#039;red tops&#039; and their editors.  Associated Press have access to a very loud and widely heard &#039;voice&#039; to propogate their opinions.  Individuals do not unless the newspapers give them that voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched Paul Dacre&#8217;s evidence to the Leveson Inquiry and was amazed how blind he was to his own hypocracy.  He attacked an &#8216;individual&#8217; (Hugh Grant) for accusing an &#8216;organisation&#8217; (Associated Newspapers) of phone hacking.  That oppitomises the &#8216;bullying&#8217; attitude of the &#8216;red tops&#8217; and their editors.  Associated Press have access to a very loud and widely heard &#8216;voice&#8217; to propogate their opinions.  Individuals do not unless the newspapers give them that voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MST/Hacked Off statement on Paul Dacre&#8217;s Leveson Inquiry appearance by Littlejohn Will</title>
		<link>http://mediastandardstrust.org/mst-news/msthacked-off-statement-on-paul-dacres-leveson-inquiry-appearance/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Littlejohn Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediastandardstrust.org/?p=2243#comment-573</guid>
		<description>Fawkes - unsure if your comment is aimed at my comment? Answer no, don&#039;t even watch his films - too light. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fawkes &#8211; unsure if your comment is aimed at my comment? Answer no, don&#8217;t even watch his films &#8211; too light. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

