Did the PCC fail when it came to phone hacking?

Media Standards Trust


Posted by Media Standards Trust

Tagged as: , , ,

Image by AMagill on Flickr (Creative Commons)

Many within the press have argued that the Leveson Inquiry is unfortunate and unnecessary, a political distraction partly designed to divert attention from politicians’ links with News International, and a threat to press freedom. They also argue that self-regulation was not to blame for the phone hacking scandal: it was a failure of law, not the Press Complaints Commission.

This pamphlet argues that those claiming the PCC did not fail in the case of phone hacking are wrong. It will show how, although its defenders are justified in saying it did not have the remit or the resources to deal with the scandal, it still failed: by claiming responsibility for regulating newsgathering without the resources or the powers to do so; by giving the deliberate and misleading impression that it was investigating phone hacking and associated problems; and by claiming there were no serious problems and no signs of malpractice beyond one rogue reporter, without having any evidence to show whether there were or were not.

This forms part of the MST’s submission to the Leveson Inquiry.

Latest news and blogs

MST Response to PCC Defence of IPSO

27.03.14 Media Standards Trust

  The Media Standards Trust has submitted a response to the Culture, Media and Sport...


Journalisted Weekly

Pistorius bail, Moody's downgrade and Child poverty

26.02.13 Pistorius bail, Moody's downgrade and Child poverty

Pistorius bail covered most


Orwell Prize newsletter

Orwell Prize 2014 Launch Debate: 21st October

18.09.13 Orwell Prize 2014 Launch Debate: 21st October

The Orwell Prize 2014 Launch Debate will be at the Frontline Club on October 21st. Book Here


PCC Watch

PCC Watch on hold

4.05.11 PCC Watch

PCC Watch is on hold until after the publication of the Leveson report